It should follow that whatever traits distinguish the camsloveaholics.com HS and the HT orientations should also have intermediate values in bisexual (BI) individuals if it is correct to expand Kinsey’s assumption to other aspects of sexual psychology. A few of the characteristics of great interest might add gender behavior that is atypical youth, intercourse part, or sex-dimorphic characteristics in adulthood and certain endocrinological factors which look, in a few studies, to dramatically discriminate between HT and HS guys (cf. Gladue et al., 1984). If it always turned out that self-identified bisexuals resembled self-identified homosexuals, for example, or heterosexuals although we do not mean to imply that such relationships would always be linear or even monotonic, bisexuality would be a questionable construct.
The Kinsey assumption would appear to have a powerful validation if average values of these traits, like sexual behavior and fantasy itself, lie for bisexuals on the continuum between corresponding values for homosexuals and heterosexuals.
There’s two other opportunities, nevertheless. The BI people can take place the exact same as either the HS or perhaps the groups that are HT more than one characteristics. This result shows that BIs are essentially similar to the males at one end associated with intimate orientation spectrum, but also for apparently adventitious reasons they usually have the ability for an even more diverse sexual pattern that is arousal. Another possibility is the fact that BI individuals may score either higher or lower then HS or HT examples on measures of these characteristics. This result suggests that BIs vary in certain way that is qualitative apart from in sexual habits or dreams, through the other two teams.