Review of methodology
Intimate orientation may be defined by intimate identification, intimate attraction, or intimate behaviour. 13 These definitions are definitely not congruent, and are also more likely to vary in degree and as time passes. We selected topics based on both intimate identity and intimate behavior. We used convenience sampling (chosen by virtue of attendance at lesbian clinics or through lesbian and bisexual womenвЂ™s community teams) since lesbian and bisexual intimate orientation is stigmatised and topics difficult to take research. 14 The clinics had been advertised as lesbian health that is sexual, while the study called a study of lesbian intimate wellness, therefore bisexual ladies are apt to be under-represented. The results presented may not be directly generalisable to lesbians and bisexual women in other settings while the community sample was purposively selected to reflect demographic diversity. These information aren’t designed to express all lesbians and bisexual females, but rather to describe variety of intimate history and training in a large test of females that have sex with females.
Studies of intimate wellness are inevitably susceptible to inaccuracies such as for instance recall bias and desirability bias that is social. 15, 16 additionally, questions regarding sexual behavior are prone to be interpreted in subtly ways that are different participants dependant on what exactly is considered вЂњsexвЂќ or perhaps a вЂњpartnerвЂќ by participants. As an example, while 85% reported past intercourse with males, 82% reported having had more than one male intimate partner.